Plastic battle could upset Californians, and do little to help the planet – Daily News

Living in California is not easy. Energy prices, housing costs, and taxes are outrageously expensive. Roads are ruined and traffic is miserable. Permanent man-made drought, potential power outages this summer, and rising rates of homelessness and crime are all reducing our quality of life.

If all that wasn’t enough, there’s a swarm of little hassles, rooted in large part in California’s unique fear of plastic.

Using the store’s self-checkout requires an extra step for consumers to announce whether they are buying a bag or not, because the useful and useful plastic bags can no longer be provided by most retailers and must be purchased.

Plastic straws are honorable.

A new law prohibits “a food establishment from providing any food supplement for single use or a standard condiment, as specified, to a consumer unless requested by the consumer.” So there are no plastic containers, chopsticks, ketchup bags, or even stirrers to drink without asking.

The use of polystyrene, the material known as Styrofoam and often used in food packaging, has been restricted to more than 125 domestic orders.

While it’s tempting to think that lawmakers might back off, having won so many victories in recent years that they can move on to something more practical for a while, the idea of ​​C.S. Lewis writing about those who “honestly” practice tyranny for the good of its victims “They never sleep: this is California, the land of the inexhaustible desire to ban any man-made functional element that makes life more comfortable.

Until last week, it looked as if voters would get a chance to decide if there would be another round of blastophobia. The California Regulations Initiative to Reduce Waste Plastic, which will establish rules that “reduce the use of single-use plastic packaging and apply a maximum one-cent item fee to single-use plastic packaging and cutlery,” is set to appear in the November 8 ballot. But now, according to the San Francisco Chronicle, lawmakers and activists have reached a “compromise that could keep the anti-plastic waste initiative away from the November ballot.”

Under the agreement, environmental groups would likely withdraw their polling procedures if the legislature approved a ‘settlement bill – and signed by the governor -‘ before the June 30 deadline to remove the initiatives from the fall ballot. The agreement is the result of “months of negotiations between environmentalists, lawmakers, and some business groups.”

The reformulated legislation will not allow manufacturers to make single-use plastic packaging, food service items, after 2031 unless the products are fully recyclable or compostable. It also charges “a fee sufficient to its participants to ensure that the billing requirements are ‘meeted’ and the plan is fully implemented.”

However, the arrangement is in jeopardy, because activists say its provisions are not severe enough. The Los Angeles Times reported Friday that while some environmental groups support the Allen bill, “other environmental groups say the legislation, as worded, does not go far enough and allows the plastics industry to self-regulate.”

Ben Allen, a Democrat from Santa Monica and author of the Senate bill, wants to save the legislation. He believes it will “put California at the forefront of the world in the fight against plastic pollution.” As usual, California lawmakers think a lot about their impact.